3月21日雅思大作文示范寫作 | 歷史遺跡的保護(hù) vs 開放利用

掃碼咨詢2026年新航道春季班

March 23, 2026

雅思作文真題直擊 | | 欄目推送說明

每場(chǎng)雅思考試之后，第一時(shí)間分享本場(chǎng)考試雅思A類大作文的范文權(quán)威解析。歡迎每周鎖定。

本期作者：張婷婷

2026年3月21日雅思大作文題目

Some people say that historical sites should be completely closed while others say that historical sites should be opened for the public to visit. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

題目分析：考題屬于議論文中雙邊討論類，討論歷史遺跡的保護(hù) vs 開放利用；

關(guān)鍵詞解析：

1. historical sites：歷史遺跡、古建筑、文化遺產(chǎn)地，具有文化價(jià)值、歷史價(jià)值、旅游經(jīng)濟(jì)價(jià)值。

2. completely closed：完全關(guān)閉，目的多為文物保護(hù)、減少維護(hù)成本。

3. opened for the public to visit：對(duì)公眾開放，目的多為文化傳播、發(fā)展旅游、創(chuàng)造經(jīng)濟(jì)與社會(huì)效益。

范文及解析

Introduction

The question of whether historical sites should be entirely closed to the public or kept accessible for visitation has sparked intense academic and societal debate. While proponents of closure argue that such sites impose an excessive financial burden, my stance is that public access to heritage sites delivers far-reaching cultural and social value.

解析

? accessible adj.可到達(dá)的，可進(jìn)入的；

? proponent n. <正式> 支持者，建議者；

? far-reaching adj.影響深遠(yuǎn)的，波及廣泛的；

譯文參考：

歷史遺跡究竟應(yīng)完全對(duì)公眾關(guān)閉，還是保持開放供人參觀，這一問題在學(xué)術(shù)界與社會(huì)層面均引發(fā)了激烈討論。盡管支持關(guān)閉的一方認(rèn)為，此類遺跡會(huì)造成過重的財(cái)政負(fù)擔(dān)，但我個(gè)人認(rèn)為，向公眾開放文化遺產(chǎn)具有深遠(yuǎn)的文化與社會(huì)價(jià)值。

Body paragraph 1

Advocates of closing historical monuments focus on long-term preservation. Many historical structures and relics are extremely fragile and can be easily damaged by continuous human activities. Frequent foot traffic, physical contact, and careless behaviour such as graffiti or flash photography all contribute to irreversible deterioration. Valuable cultural heritage, without strict protection, might be lost forever. Besides, the exorbitant expenditure required for the conservation of historical structures could be reallocated to enhance public well-being. The preservation of ancient architectural heritage undeniably demands substantial financial investment, yet yields limited tangible benefits to the practical welfare of citizens, especially socio-economically disadvantaged groups. Accordingly, governments ought to prioritise financial allocations toward core public sectors such as healthcare, education, and infrastructure.

解析

? advocate n. 擁護(hù)者，提倡者；

? fragile adj. 易碎的，易損的；

? graffiti n. 涂鴉，胡寫亂畫；

? flash photography 閃光燈攝影；

? irreversible adj. 不可挽回的，無法逆轉(zhuǎn)的；

? deterioration n. 惡化；

? exorbitant adj.（價(jià)格、要求等）過分的，離譜的；

? substantial adj. 大量的，價(jià)值巨大的；

? tangible adj. 明確的，真實(shí)的；

? prioritise vt. 給予……優(yōu)先權(quán)；按優(yōu)先順序處理；

譯文參考：

支持關(guān)閉歷史古跡的人士，其核心主張?jiān)谟趯?shí)現(xiàn)長(zhǎng)期保護(hù)。許多歷史建筑與文物本身極為脆弱，極易在持續(xù)的人類活動(dòng)中遭到損壞。頻繁的人流踩踏、肢體接觸，以及涂鴉、使用閃光燈拍攝等不當(dāng)行為，都會(huì)造成不可逆轉(zhuǎn)的損耗。若缺乏嚴(yán)格的保護(hù)措施，珍貴的文化遺產(chǎn)可能永遠(yuǎn)消逝。此外，投入歷史建筑保護(hù)的巨額資金，也可被重新調(diào)配以改善民生。對(duì)古建筑遺產(chǎn)的維護(hù)固然需要龐大的財(cái)政投入，但其為民眾，尤其是社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)弱勢(shì)群體帶來的實(shí)際效益卻十分有限。因此，政府應(yīng)將財(cái)政資源優(yōu)先投向醫(yī)療、教育、基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施等核心公共領(lǐng)域。

Body paragraph 2

However, in my personal estimation, notwithstanding the substantial short-term maintenance costs, opening historical sites to the public acts as a powerful catalyst for sustainable economic growth and comprehensive social progress. Only by maintaining the accessibility of such heritage landmarks to a multitude of domestic and international tourists can these sites serve as robust engines of national prosperity. To illustrate, the Palace Museum in Beijing, embodying profound cultural significance, attracts a vast number of global visitors each year. Such considerable influx of tourists strongly drives spending on accommodation, local cuisine and admission fees, generating a colossal amount of fiscal revenue for the country and stimulating the tourism industry. Furthermore, the expansion of the tourism sector creates a wide range of related employment opportunities, including professional tour guides, culinary practitioners and hospitality staff. As employment rates rise and residents attain stable livelihoods, social stability is inevitably strengthened.

解析

? notwithstanding prep. 雖然，盡管；

? catalyst n. 催化劑；

? accessibility n.（地方）易于進(jìn)入性；易使用性，可及性；

? a multitude of 大量的；許多的；

? robust adj. 強(qiáng)健的，強(qiáng)壯的；

? embody v. 具體表現(xiàn)，體現(xiàn)；

? a vast number of 大量的，許多的；

? influx n.（人或物的）大量涌入，大量流入；

? cuisine n. 烹飪，風(fēng)味；

? a colossal amount of 數(shù)量龐大的；

? fiscal revenue 財(cái)政收入；

? culinary adj. <正式> 烹飪的，食物的；

? practitioner n. <正式> 從事者，實(shí)踐者；

? inevitably adv. 不可避免地，必然地；

譯文參考：

然而在我看來，盡管短期內(nèi)需要承擔(dān)高昂的維護(hù)成本，向公眾開放歷史遺跡仍是推動(dòng)經(jīng)濟(jì)可持續(xù)增長(zhǎng)與社會(huì)全面進(jìn)步的重要?jiǎng)恿ΑＮㄓ凶屵@些文化地標(biāo)持續(xù)面向海內(nèi)外廣大游客開放，才能成為國(guó)家繁榮發(fā)展的有力引擎。以北京故宮為例，其承載著深厚的文化內(nèi)涵，每年吸引大量海內(nèi)外游客。規(guī)模可觀的客流顯著帶動(dòng)了住宿、當(dāng)?shù)夭惋嫾伴T票消費(fèi)，既為國(guó)家創(chuàng)造了可觀的財(cái)政收入，也有力拉動(dòng)了旅游業(yè)發(fā)展。此外，旅游業(yè)的擴(kuò)張還能創(chuàng)造導(dǎo)游、餐飲從業(yè)者、酒店服務(wù)人員等大量相關(guān)就業(yè)崗位。隨著就業(yè)率提升、民眾生活趨于穩(wěn)定，社會(huì)安定也必然得到進(jìn)一步鞏固。

Conclusion

In brief, while closing historical sites may appear to conserve financial resources for immediate welfare programmes, it loses sight of their enduring economic and cultural significance. Personally, historical sites ought to remain open to the public, as not only do they safeguard intangible cultural heritage but also propel economic vitality and enhance collective well-being over the long haul.

解析

? lose sight of 忽略；

? intangible adj. 不可捉摸的；（資產(chǎn)，利益）無形的；

? propel v. 推進(jìn)，驅(qū)動(dòng)；

? over the long haul 長(zhǎng)期來看；

譯文參考：

總之，盡管關(guān)閉歷史遺跡看似能節(jié)省財(cái)政資金，用于當(dāng)下的民生項(xiàng)目，卻忽視了其長(zhǎng)久的經(jīng)濟(jì)與文化價(jià)值。在我看來，歷史遺跡應(yīng)當(dāng)對(duì)公眾保持開放，因?yàn)樗鼈儾粌H能夠守護(hù)非物質(zhì)文化遺產(chǎn)，更能在長(zhǎng)期內(nèi)激發(fā)經(jīng)濟(jì)活力、增進(jìn)全民福祉。

如果你寫雅思大作文時(shí)總是：開頭卡殼、詞窮寫不滿；寫了很多篇，分?jǐn)?shù)卻卡在6分……老師真的理解你那種“很努力卻提不上分”的焦慮。

春季是提分關(guān)鍵期，新航道雅思課程重點(diǎn)針對(duì)：

拆透題型結(jié)構(gòu)，寫作有章可循；

真題練+逐句改，提升思路和表達(dá)；

積累詞匯句型，擺脫機(jī)械套模板。

春季早鳥報(bào)名享專屬優(yōu)惠

別等到考前焦慮，掃碼立刻咨詢你的提分方案